| Case name - EFA assigned to an isolated tree at unequal intersection of two parcel | |
| ISSUE - The (isolated) tree is along the intersection of 2 parcels, both being declared by (distinct) farmers. However, one parcel is more present around the tree than the other one (taking ¾ of its crown). | REPLY - It is up to the farmers to declare EFAs which are shared by different beneficiaries. The beneficiaries themselves remain responsible for their declarations. The proportion of the EFA declared by the farmer depends on the proportion the EFA is 'at disposal of' the farmer. Although practically it might usually not be the case, theoretically, it could be possible to have a tree 70% at disposal of one farmer and 30% at disposal of another farmer; any variation between 0 and 100% is theoretically acceptable. Any double declaration of area is not allowed. The total declared area of each EFA by the two different beneficiaries should never go beyond the total area of the EFA. Where using conversion and weighting factors, it is in no case possible to declare more than 30m2 per tree. |
|
Primary picture
 Orthoimage  Sketch  |